I hate the fact that due both to their CEO's addlepated statements (which they did try to at least play down, if not actively distance themselves from) and the zero-tolerance Internet making the very act of eating at Chick-Fil-A a hate crime, I can't just buy food there without being considered a bigoted cretin.
Yes, gay marriage, gay rights and gay tolerance should all become things, and should all become so accepted that the "gay" part gets forgotten, and they just become marriage, rights and tolerance. Nobody is disputing this.
But just like the Westboro Baptist Church, by casting a light on CFA, you give them MORE power.
So why has this become the straw that broke the Internet's back? Cause it's an easy target. They're not going to fight back, they're not going to sue, they're fun to draw witty graphics about. And what will it achieve? Very little. It's not going to change the minds of the folks who are avowed anti-gay. It might bring their choices to the light of a small number of people, but pretty much, there aren't that many internet-savvy people who didn't already know about it.
All it's done, as I mentioned at the start, is so over-politicize lunch that it's turned eating there into a blow against freedom. And one without finger Muppets, as well.
Regardless of the fact that there are gay employees of the chain, despite the Nashua NH franchise co-sponsoring the local gay pride festival this month, the company is being treated as a monolithic uni-minded entity, with no dissension or consideration being accepted. Because it's easier to hate (and inspire others to hate) a single homogenous (you should pardon the term) entity, as opposed to a large number of individuals who may or may not agree with the company's stand to varying degrees, and may not deserve, or want to deal with, the brickbats from either or the other side. It's better to de-humanize the enemy.
It's exactly BECAUSE of that dogpile-on-the-rabbit tactic that CFA has been able to spin this situation so that they seem the put-upon party, and the pro-gay-rights people the bad guys. THAT'S the reason their little support day went so well - people absolutely came because they now perceive the place as "Anti gay marriage", but they wouldn't have found that OUT had the internet gotten up on its hind legs and let everyone know. It's the exact inverse of how it usually goes - most of the time it's the conservatives bringing something to everyone's attention, much to the delight of the folks who made it, cause it's almost guaranteed to increase sales as everyone runs to see what's so bad about it. The Streisand Effect has finally turned around and bit you.
Plus, let's remember, they're members of a losing cause. They're donating money to organizations that no rational person seriously listens to. One of them just had their founder recant their practice of "converting" gays. Not because of protests, or political pressure, or witty graphics on the Internet, but because they just plain figured out it doesn't fucking WORK.
They're throwing their money down a rat hole on a fool's crusade. They might as well be donating to the Flat Earth Society.
Until Cathy The Younger opened his yap in that interview, the awareness about the company's stand was known by few, and cared about by less. It was the myriad re-postings and amplifications that made sure everyone knew about it now, and turned a fast food company into a national tentpole for the gay movement. And they don't WANT to be. They go out of their way to tell their employees to not respond when customers bring the issue up, one way or another. They would love it if they could just get back to the business of selling chicken sandwiches.
It'd be great if they were willing to do that by not donating to those causes now, but I don't see that happening.
If this were the drug war, they'd be the street dealers, the one the Government say they're not as interested in taking down. They need the big guys, the suppliers. But they're harder to fight, so they just pick up a bunch of the street dealers (and continue to demonize the users) to give the impression they're making progress.
Go after the organizations that CFA donate to. Get people to grasp the hateful things those organizations are doing directly, not connecting the place they buy lunch to the evil by following the money. That doesn't work - ask the guy who came up with the campaign that claimed video piracy led to terrorism.